Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Net Carbohydrates - useful or useless?

During the last decade, the popularity of low-carb diet is increased A LOT As a result, the food industry has tried to go to this fund by people with low-carb versions of foods that are low carb, of course, not.

In most cases, I believe that failed because of "low carb" products, carbohydrates are generally serious or loaded with sugar alcohols and other "no impact" that, althoughInsulin can not spike the digestion.

If you have not seen the bars of the protein eaten so artificially low in carbohydrates (these are the worst!) Then verbage "Come On" net carbs. The classifications of "net carb" was originally), written by the actin people (who, if he did not know, now I'm basically a successful company and use the Atkins book as a marketing tool.

'Net Carbohydrates "substantially all the carbohydraterelevant in a particular food, is the level of blood sugar. Processed foods are low carb stuffed (maltose, lactitol, and xylitol) a) replace the sweetness of sugar alcohols? Vacuum left by the removal of glucose (sugar chocolate anyone. These sugars are not easily digestible (if any), and therefore no impact on blood sugar levels as normal sugar. "Net carb" classification that allows sugar (in usually combined with glycerol) are not counted. So, if a protein bar35 grams carbohydrates, but 15 of them are maltose and glycerine, then the package is "Now, with net 20grams carbohydrates alone."

Why do you care?

Avoid these foods. First, sugar alcohols are not well tolerated by most, and you end up with a bad attack of diarrhea (Note:. Zuccherato many sugar-free chewing gum with xylitol, the amount of rubber is negligible, so do not have to worry about it ). Secondly, food, sugar alcohols are processed at the most. The Nakednutritional approach is about creating a model of healthy eating, in which the by-product of the body you want (Pretty Good product eh?).

As a general rule, ignore the products, 'the' promoting net carbs.

No comments:

Post a Comment